Child Care Center
✓ Licensed
Happy Kids Daycare, Corp
West Valley, UT
· Salt Lake County
4062 S 4000 W,
West Valley, UT 84120
Quick Facts
Capacity
58 children
Age Range
Five Year Olds,Four Year Olds,Infants (0-11 months),School Age (6-12 Year Olds),Three Year Olds,Toddlers (12-23 months),Two Year Olds
Type of Care
Full Time,Part Time,24-Hour Care,After School,After School Early Day,Before School,Graveyard Shift,Occasional Evening/Overnight,Occasional Saturday,Occasional Sunday,Open School Holidays,Preschool Program (2-4 hours daily),Saturday Care,School-Age Summer Care,Sunday Care,Swing Shift,Weekends,Year Round
Transportation
Smoke-free Environment,Near Public Transportation,No Pets
Languages
English, Arabic, Spanish
Subsidized Program
Participates
State Rating
Default Foundation of Quality
Missing details such as rates? Suggest an update to help other families.
Licensed Child Care Center
Active License
License Number
F20-82700
Licensed Since
2021
License Issued
Apr 1, 2026
Active Through
Mar 31, 2027
Issued By
Utah Department of Health
District Office
Utah Child Care Licensing
Reviews
Write a Review
Be the first to review this childcare provider. Write a review about Happy Kids Daycare, Corp. Let other families know what's great, or what could be improved. Please read our brief review guidelines to make your review as helpful as possible.
Review Policy: ChildcareCenter.us does not actively screen or monitor user reviews, nor do we verify or edit content.
Reviews reflect only the opinion of the writer. We ask that users follow our
review guidelines.
Providers are welcome to respond to parental reviews, however we ask that they identify themselves as the provider.
About the Provider
Happy Kids Daycare, Corp is a Child Care Center in West Valley UT, with a maximum capacity of 58 children. This child care center helps with children in the age range of Five Year Olds,Four Year Olds,Infants (0-11 months),School Age (6-12 Year Olds),Three Year Olds,Toddlers (12-23 months),Two Year Olds. It is open Monday - Sunday, 12:00 AM - 11:45 PM. The provider also participates in a subsidized child care program.
Hours of Operation
- Monday12:00 AM - 11:45 PM
- Tuesday12:00 AM - 11:45 PM
- Wednesday12:00 AM - 11:45 PM
- Thursday12:00 AM - 11:45 PM
- Friday12:00 AM - 11:45 PM
- Saturday 12:00 AM - 11:45 PM
- Sunday 12:00 AM - 11:45 PM
Inspection/Report History
Where possible, ChildcareCenter provides inspection reports as a service to families. This information is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed. We encourage families to contact the daycare provider directly with any questions or concerns. Reports can also be verified with your local daycare licensing office.
| Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Corrections |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-17 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2026-02-25 | Announced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2025-09-23 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2025-08-06 | Follow-Up Inspection | Manager approval, no follow up needed: 2025-08-06 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R381-100-10(1)(a)-(c) - Single-age group ratios & group size The provider was out of compliance with R381-100-10(1)(c) by failing to maintain ratios and exceeding the number of children in their single age group. In the infant/toddler classroom, there were 6 children with one caregiver. This is a repeat noncompliance as noted on 10/04/2023. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On August 6, 2025, the licensor verified that the provider provided an addition caregiver for the infant/toddler classroom to maintain the child to staff ratios, as required in rule. |
||
| 2025-08-06 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2025-07-07 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-07-07 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-19(12) - Stationary play equipment not on hard surface The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-19(12) by not ensuring that stationary play equipment is placed on protective cushioning. In the outdoor area, there was play equipment that was placed on artificial turf. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on February 7, 2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On July 7, 2025, the licensor verified the provider made the play equipment inaccessible to children until it can be placed on cushioning as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-07-07 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-08-06 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-6(10) - Children's admission and health assessment form completed prior to admittance The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-6(10) by not ensuring that a child had a completed admission and health assessment form before being admitted into the program. At the facility, a child did not have a completed admission and health assessment form. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On August 6, 2025, the licensor verified the child had a completed admission and health assessment form as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-07-07 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-08-06 |
|
Finds: CITED - Low - Warning $100 R381-100-14(9) - Fire/disaster drill documentation kept onsite The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-14(9) by not having the documentation for fire and disaster drills on-site for review. At the facility, there was no documentation on-site for review of the previous 12 months of fire and disaster drills. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on August 9, 2024. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On August 6, 2025, the licensor verified documentation of fire and disaster drills was on-site for review as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-06-11 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-09-23 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $150 - Warning $150 R381-100-14(13) - Medical attention reporting requirements The provider was out of compliance with R381-100-14(13) by not submitting a critical incident report to OL within one business day, when a child was injured while in care and received medical attention. On April 28, 2025, a child in care fell and received an injury to their head that required stitches, and this was not reported to OL. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On September 23, 2025, the licensor verified that the provider will ensure that if a child is injured while in care and receives medical attention, the provider shall submit a critical incident report to OL within one business day, as required in rule. |
||
| 2025-06-11 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection Complaint Date: 2025-06-10 |
Manager approval, no follow up needed: 2025-06-11 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-11(1)(a)-(g) - Provide and maintain active supervision The Provider was out of compliance with R381-100-11(1)(b) by failing to ensure each caregiver provides and maintains active supervision of each child and for school-age children, a caregiver can hear the children and is close enough to intervene. During the inspection, in the Dragonfly classroom, there were 13 school age children and no caregiver. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On June 11, 2025, the licensor verified that the provider would provide and maintain active supervision of every child and ensure the caregiver for the school-age children, can hear the children and is close enough to intervene, as required in rule. |
||
| 2025-03-05 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2025-02-07 | Announced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2024-09-11 | Non On-Site Inspection | |
| 2024-09-03 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-09-11 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $150 - Warning $150 R381-100-6(12)(a)-(b) - Children's admission and health assessment reviewed, updated, signed, and on-site The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having incomplete children's records. At the time of the inspection, one child's admission and health assessment form was not reviewed and signed annually by the parent. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 9/11/2024, the provider emailed a photo of the child's admission and health assessment form that had been reviewed, updated and signed annually as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-08-09 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-09-11 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-6(12)(a)-(b) - Children's admission and health assessment reviewed, updated, signed, and on-site The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having incomplete children's records. At the time of the inspection, 7 children's admission and health assessment forms were not on-site for review by the department. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 9/11/2024, the provider emailed a photo of the child's admission and health assessment form that had been reviewed, updated and signed annually as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-08-09 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-08-09 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-24(13)(a)-(d) - Baby food, formula, breast milk brought from home requirements The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring baby food, formula, or breast milk that is brought from home is properly labeled. In the infant's classroom there were bottles not labeled with the child's name or the date and time of preparation. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 8/9/2024, the licensor verified the caregiver labeled the bottles and food containers with the required information as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-08-09 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-08-09 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-11(4) - No unsupervised contact for student interns and guest The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that guests do not have unsupervised contact with any child in care. At the facility, there was a guest who had unsupervised contact with children in care. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 8/9/2024, the licensor verified there was a caregiver to supervise the guest. |
||
| 2024-03-27 | Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2024-03-21 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-03-21 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-13(4) - Choking hazards inaccessible to children under 3 The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having choking hazards accessible to children younger than three years old. In the 2-3 classroom, there were choking hazards accessible to children younger than three years old. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 3/21/2024, the licensor verified the caregiver made the pieces of drywall inaccessible to children under three years old as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-03-07 | Non On-Site Inspection | |
| 2024-03-04 | Announced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2023-11-16 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2023-10-19 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2023-10-04 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection | Correction Verified: 2023-10-04 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-10(1)(a)-(b) - Single-age group ratios & group size The provider was out of compliance with this rule by exceeding the number of allowed children with one caregiver. In the infant/toddler classroom, there were 9 children with one caregiver. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 10/04/2023, the licensor verified that the director will ensure ratios are maintained as stated in rule. |
||
| 2023-10-04 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection Complaint Date: 2023-10-02 |
Correction Verified: 2023-10-04 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-20(4)(a)-(i) - Driver requirements and responsibilities The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that each child being transported is in an individual safety restraint. During transportation, the children were transported in a vehicle that did not have a child restraint for every child being transported. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 10/04/2023, the licensor verified that the director will ensure children are transported in a vehicle with individual safety restraints for every child be transported as stated in rule. |
||
| 2023-10-04 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection Complaint Date: 2023-10-02 |
Correction Verified: 2023-10-04 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R381-100-11(1)(a)-(f) - Provide and maintain active supervision The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring all children were supervised. In the facility, children younger than five years old were left unsupervised several times. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 10/04/2023, the licensor verified that the director will ensure all children are supervised as stated in rule. |
||
| 2023-09-28 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2023-09-28 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $200 - Warning $200 R381-100-11(1)(a)-(f) - Provide and maintain active supervision The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having caregivers unable to accurately account for all children in their group. In the infants classroom, the caregiver stated that they had 8 children, the other caregiver said 6 children, and they had 7 in the group. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 09/28/2023, the licensor verified the caregiver had an accurate account of all children in their group as stated in rule. |
||
If you are a provider and believe any information is incorrect, please contact us. We will research your concern and make corrections accordingly.
Providers in ZIP Code 84120
Viewing an Infant Daycare?
Helpful Resources
Choosing Infant Care
Read article →
Questions to Ask During a Tour
Read article →
Infant Licensing Guide
Read article →