Childcare Network #92B
Quick Facts
Missing details such as transportation or rates? Suggest an update to help other families.
Reviews
Write a Review
Be the first to review this childcare provider. Write a review about Childcare Network #92B. Let other families know what's great, or what could be improved. Please read our brief review guidelines to make your review as helpful as possible.
About the Provider
Hours of Operation
- Days of Operation Monday–Friday
Inspection/Report History
Where possible, ChildcareCenter provides inspection reports as a service to families. This information is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed. We encourage families to contact the daycare provider directly with any questions or concerns. Reports can also be verified with your local daycare licensing office.
| Date | Type | Violations | Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-23 | Unannounced Inspection | Yes | |
| 2026-02-23 | Violation | 428 | GS 110-91(12); .0508(a) |
| A current activity plan was not posted for each group of children for reference. A current lesson plan was not posted in space #2 or #3. The lesson plan posted in space #1 was not dated. | |||
| 2026-02-23 | Violation | 616 | .2822(a)(1-4) |
| Toys and other mouth-contact surfaces were not cleaned and sanitized daily when used or cleaned more frequently if visibly dirty. A dirty toy bin was not present in space #3 nor were there any identified mouthed toys removed from the environment. | |||
| 2026-02-23 | Violation | 707 | .0601(d) |
| Equipment and furnishings not meeting the requirements outlined in child care .0601(b) and (c) were not removed or made inaccessible. Books were monitored in poor condition in spaces #2 and #3. | |||
| 2026-02-23 | Violation | 1805 | G.S. 110-90.2 & .2703(r) |
| A child care operator did not notify the Division of any new child care providers, as defined in G.S. 110-90.2(a)(2), who were hired or moved into the child care facility within five business days. One staff member hired in December 2025, was not linked to the facility in the ABCMS. | |||
| 2026-02-23 | Violation | 1867 | .0605(k)(1-4) |
| The depth of the loose surfacing was not based on critical height of the equipment. The protective surfacing did not measure at least six inches in depth was compacted. | |||
| 2025-10-23 | Unannounced Inspection | Yes | |
| 2025-10-23 | Violation | 707 | .0601(d) |
| Equipment and furnishings not meeting the requirements outlined in child care .0601(b) and (c) were not removed or made inaccessible. At least three books were monitored in poor repair in space #2. | |||
| 2025-10-23 | Violation | 1823 | .0607(d)(10) |
| The EPR Plan did not include the location of the Ready to Go File and or the required information. The monitored RTGF was not current with each child's emergency contact information, or allergy information. There were two children whose required information was not maintained in the file. | |||
| 2025-10-23 | Violation | 1867 | .0605(k)(1-4) |
| The depth of the loose surfacing was not based on critical height of the equipment. The mulch/fall zone at the base of the yellow slide didn't meet six inches in depth. | |||
| 2025-03-05 | Unannounced Inspection | Yes | |
| 2025-03-05 | Violation | 707 | .0601(d) |
| Equipment and furnishings not meeting the requirements outlined in child care .0601(b) and (c) were not removed or made inaccessible. A plastic flower on a Little Tykes Tree house was monitored broken off, leaving the green plastic stem protruding. | |||
| 2025-03-05 | Violation | 721 | G.S. 110-91(6); .0601(b) |
| All equipment and furnishings were not in good repair. The white fence slat was monitored boding over by overgrown vines and weeds pushing up against the fence. | |||
| 2025-03-05 | Violation | 1898 | .1102(a) |
| Staff did not complete the health and safety training within one year of employment. Three existing staff were required to complete H & S training by March 1, 2025. | |||
| 2025-01-08 | Unannounced Inspection | Yes | 0125-071L |
| 2025-01-08 | Violation | 852 | .0802 (e) |
| Incident reports were not completed each time a child was injured, it did not include all the information required in rule, it was not signed by the parent and/or it was not maintained in the child's file. Various completed incident reports were not filed in the applicable child's file. They were maintained in the incident log binder instead. | |||
| 2025-01-08 | Violation | 853 | .0802(g)(1-6) |
| Incident logs were not completed and maintained as required. An incident report completed and signed on 11/13/2024 was not monitored logged onto the center's incident log. Ms. Demerson added the missing incident to the log during the visit. | |||
| 2025-01-08 | Violation | 886 | .0606(a)(5) |
| The temperature in a room where infants aged 12 months or younger where sleeping exceeded 75 degrees. The infant room/Space #1 temperature was monitored at 79f instead of maintaining at 75f or under. The temperature was manually altered by the caregiver during the visit and the temperature was later monitored at 75f. | |||
| 2024-07-17 | Unannounced Inspection | Yes | |
| 2024-07-17 | Violation | 887 | .0606(g) |
| Caregivers did not document compliance with visually checking on sleeping infants aged 12 months or younger and/or the documents were not maintained for a minimum of one month. Three (3) infants were in their crib, one was sleeping, nothing was documented on the safe sleep chart. When I asked how long the infant had been sleeping, the teacher stated since 10:00, it was 10:46. She stated the other infant just woke up and had been sleeping for about an hour. She stated that the third infant had just been put in the crib. | |||
| 2024-07-17 | Violation | 1034 | .0701(a) |
| All staff, including the director, did not have an annual health questionnaire on file following the initial medical statement. Staff did not have current health questionnaires on file. | |||
| 2024-07-17 | Violation | 1825 | .0607(f) |
| All staff did not review the center's EPR Plan during orientation and/or on an annual basis with the trained staff. Documentation of the review was not maintained on file. The EPR plan was completed, but had not been reviewed with the staff. | |||
| 2024-07-17 | Violation | 1897 | .1102(g) |
| The child care administrator and all staff did not complete the Recognizing and Responding to Suspicions of Child Maltreatment training within 90 days of employment. Two (2) staff did not complete Child Maltreatment within the first 90 days. | |||
| 2024-04-11 | Unannounced Inspection | Yes | |
| 2024-04-11 | Violation | 887 | .0606(g) |
| Caregivers did not document compliance with visually checking on sleeping infants aged 12 months or younger and/or the documents were not maintained for a minimum of one month. One (1) infant was lying awake in a crib, the staff member stated the infant had just woken up. The Safe Sleep Chart had last been documented at 9:45, it was now 10:20 and nothing else had been documented. | |||
| 2024-04-11 | Violation | 1067 | .1101(a)(b) |
| Each new employee did not complete, within the first two weeks of employment, six clock hours of training in required topic areas. An employee who started employment March 19, 2024 did not have documented that the required orientation had been completed. | |||
| 2024-03-11 | Unannounced Inspection | Yes | 0324-146L |
| 2024-03-11 | Violation | 892 | .0606(b) |
| The center's safe sleep policy was not posted in a prominent place in the infant room where parents and caregivers were able to view daily. The center did not have a developed ITS-SIDS policy posted in the infant room. In the older infant space, not in use, there was a sample ITS SIDS policy that was not customized. | |||
If you are a provider and believe any information is incorrect, please contact us. We will research your concern and make corrections accordingly.
Providers in ZIP Code 28205
Looking for Child Care?