St. John's CCDC- Sugarhouse - Salt Lake City UT Child Care Center

1432 S 1100 E , Salt Lake City UT 84105
(801) 410-8976

About the Provider

Description: St. John's CCDC- Sugarhouse is a Child Care Center in Salt Lake City UT, with a maximum capacity of 161 children. This child care center helps with children in the age range of Five Year Olds,Four Year Olds,Infants (0-11 months),School Age (6-12 Year Olds),Three Year Olds,Toddlers (12-23 months),Two Year Olds. The provider also participates in a subsidized child care program.

Program and Licensing Details

  • License Number: F20-78220
  • Capacity: 161
  • Age Range: Five Year Olds,Four Year Olds,Infants (0-11 months),School Age (6-12 Year Olds),Three Year Olds,Toddlers (12-23 months),Two Year Olds
  • State Rating: Default Foundation of Quality
  • Enrolled in Subsidized Child Care Program: Yes
  • Type of Care: Full Time,Part Time,After School,After School Early Day,School-Age Summer Care,Year Round
  • Schools Served: Granite - Eastwood,Salt Lake - Dilworth,Salt Lake - Emerson,Salt Lake - Highland Park,Salt Lake - Indian Hills,Salt Lake - Uintah,Salt Lake - Whittier
  • Initial License Issue Date: 2020-06-30
  • District Office: Utah Child Care Licensing
  • District Office Phone: (801)273-6617 (Note: This is not the facility phone number.)

Location Map

Inspection/Report History

Where possible, ChildcareCenter provides inspection reports as a service to families. This information is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed. We encourage families to contact the daycare provider directly with any questions or concerns, as the provider may have already addressed some or all issues. Reports can also be verified with your local daycare licensing office.

Inspection Date Inspection Type Corrections
2026-05-20 Follow-Up Inspection
2026-04-27 Announced, Annual Inspection Correction Verified: 2026-04-27
Finds: CITED - Moderate
R381-100-10(1)(a)-(c) - Single-age group ratios & group size The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-10(1)(c) by not ensuring that they do not exceed the number of children in the caregiver-to-child ratio for a single-age group of children. In the Hoppers classroom, there were ten toddlers with two caregivers.
2025-08-27 Unannounced, Annual Inspection
2025-05-28 Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection, Follow-Up Inspection
2025-04-28 Follow-Up Inspection Correction Verified: 2025-05-28
Finds: CITED - Moderate
R381-100-9(18) - Fence, wall, solid barrier at least 4 feet high The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-9(18) by not ensuring the fence enclosing the outdoor area is at least four feet high. In the east play area, a part of the fence did not measure four feet high from the ground. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on April 4, 2025.
2025-04-04 Announced, Annual Inspection Correction Verified: 2025-04-28
Finds: CITED - Low
R381-100-24(22)(a)-(c) - Infant/toddler diapering documentation The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-24(22)(b)-(c) by not documenting each toddler's diaper change each day within the hour. In the Crickets classroom, there were diaper changes that had not been documented. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on December 18, 2023.
2025-04-04 Announced, Annual Inspection Correction Verified: 2025-04-04
Finds: CITED - Moderate
R381-100-13(7) - Plastic bags, latex gloves, and balloons inaccessible to under 5 The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-13(7) by having plastic bags large enough to fit a child's head accessible to children younger than five years old. In the bathroom of the Crickets classroom, there were plastic garbage bags accessible to children.
2025-04-04 Announced, Annual Inspection Correction Verified: 2025-04-04
Finds: CITED - Moderate
R381-100-9(18) - Fence, wall, solid barrier at least 4 feet high The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-9(18) by not ensuring the fence enclosing the outdoor area is at least four feet high. In the east play area, a part of the fence did not measure four feet high from the ground.
2024-12-12 Follow-Up Inspection
2024-11-05 Follow-Up Inspection
2024-10-29 Complaint, Investigation Inspection Correction Verified: 2024-10-29
Finds: CITED - High
R381-100-6(3) - No conduct adverse to children allowed The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not protecting children from conduct that endangers the children in care. At the facility, during school transportation, a child was left at their school when the van driver did not follow the center's transportation procedure.
2024-10-16 Non On-Site Inspection
2024-10-08 Unannounced, Annual Inspection Correction Verified: 2024-10-08
Finds: CITED - Moderate
R381-100-20(2)(a)-(e) - Vehicle requirements The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not supplying the vehicle with the required first aid supplies. In a bus used for transporting children, there were no tweezers. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
2024-10-08 Unannounced, Annual Inspection Correction Verified: 2024-10-16
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate
R381-100-6(12)(a)-(b) - Children's admission and health assessment reviewed, updated, signed, and on-site The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having incomplete children's records. At the time of the inspection, 3 children's admission and health assessment forms had not been reviewed, updated, and signed or initialed at least annually. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.
2024-06-10 Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection

If you are a provider and you believe any information is incorrect, please contact us. We will research your concern and make corrections accordingly.

Reviews

Be the first to review this childcare provider. Write a review about St. John's CCDC- Sugarhouse. Let other families know what’s great, or what could be improved. Please read our brief review guidelines to make your review as helpful as possible.

Review Policy:
ChildcareCenter.us does not actively screen or monitor user reviews, nor do we verify or edit content. Reviews reflect only the opinion of the writer. We ask that users follow our review guidelines. If you see a review that does not reflect these guidelines, you can email us. We will assess the review and decide the appropriate next step. Please note – we will not remove a review simply because it is negative. Providers are welcome to respond to parental reviews, however we ask that they identify themselves as the provider.

Ask the Community

Connect, Seek Advice, Share Knowledge


Providers in ZIP Code 84105