St. John's CCDC- Sugarhouse
Quick Facts
Missing details such as rates? Suggest an update to help other families.
Reviews
Write a Review
Be the first to review this childcare provider. Write a review about St. John's CCDC- Sugarhouse. Let other families know what's great, or what could be improved. Please read our brief review guidelines to make your review as helpful as possible.
About the Provider
Hours of Operation
- Monday7:00 AM - 6:00 PM
- Tuesday7:00 AM - 6:00 PM
- Wednesday7:00 AM - 6:00 PM
- Thursday7:00 AM - 6:00 PM
- Friday7:00 AM - 6:00 PM
- Saturday Closed
- Sunday Closed
Inspection/Report History
Where possible, ChildcareCenter provides inspection reports as a service to families. This information is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed. We encourage families to contact the daycare provider directly with any questions or concerns. Reports can also be verified with your local daycare licensing office.
| Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Corrections |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-27 | Investigation Inspection | |
| 2026-05-20 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2026-04-27 | Announced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2025-08-27 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2025-05-28 | Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection, Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2025-04-28 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-05-28 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-9(18) - Fence, wall, solid barrier at least 4 feet high The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-9(18) by not ensuring the fence enclosing the outdoor area is at least four feet high. In the east play area, a part of the fence did not measure four feet high from the ground. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on April 4, 2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On May 28th 2025, the licensor verified that the provider maintained the fence at a height of 4 feet for the outdoor area as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-04 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-28 |
|
Finds: CITED - Low - Warning $100 R381-100-24(22)(a)-(c) - Infant/toddler diapering documentation The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-24(22)(b)-(c) by not documenting each toddler's diaper change each day within the hour. In the Crickets classroom, there were diaper changes that had not been documented. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on December 18, 2023. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On April 28, 2025, the licensor verified that the toddler's diaper changes wer being recorded within the hour as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-04 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-04 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-13(7) - Plastic bags, latex gloves, and balloons inaccessible to under 5 The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-13(7) by having plastic bags large enough to fit a child's head accessible to children younger than five years old. In the bathroom of the Crickets classroom, there were plastic garbage bags accessible to children. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On March 4, 2025, the licensor verified the provider made the plastic bags inaccessible as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-04 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-04 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-9(18) - Fence, wall, solid barrier at least 4 feet high The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-9(18) by not ensuring the fence enclosing the outdoor area is at least four feet high. In the east play area, a part of the fence did not measure four feet high from the ground. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On March 4, 2025, the licensor verified the provider redistributed the wood chips away from the fence so that it measured at least four feet high from the ground as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-12-12 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2024-11-05 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2024-10-29 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection Complaint Date: 2024-10-28 |
Correction Verified: 2024-10-29 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-6(3) - No conduct adverse to children allowed The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not protecting children from conduct that endangers the children in care. At the facility, during school transportation, a child was left at their school when the van driver did not follow the center's transportation procedure. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 10/29/2024, the licensor verified that the director will ensure all children are protected from any conduct that endangers them as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-10-16 | Non On-Site Inspection | |
| 2024-10-08 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-10-08 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-20(2)(a)-(e) - Vehicle requirements The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not supplying the vehicle with the required first aid supplies. In a bus used for transporting children, there were no tweezers. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 10/8/2024, the licensor verified the provider placed tweezers in the bus as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-10-08 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-10-16 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $300 - Warning $150 R381-100-6(12)(a)-(b) - Children's admission and health assessment reviewed, updated, signed, and on-site The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having incomplete children's records. At the time of the inspection, 3 children's admission and health assessment forms had not been reviewed, updated, and signed or initialed at least annually. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 10/16/2024, the provider submitted through their portal photos of the admission and health assessment documents updated annually for the three children as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-06-10 | Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2024-05-21 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-05-21 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-24(18) - Safe infant sleep equipment The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having an infant sleeping in equipment not designed for sleep. In the Honeybee classroom, there was an infant sleeping in a swing. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 5/21/2024, the licensor verified the caregiver removed the infant from the swing to a crib as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-05-09 | Announced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2024-01-31 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2023-12-18 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2023-12-18 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-17(1) - Nonrefrigerated medications requirements The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having medications accessible below 48 inches. In the Caterpillars classroom, essential oils were found in a drawer accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 12/18/2023, the licensor verified that the provider closed and locked the drawer that the medication was stored in as stated in rule. |
||
| 2023-12-18 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-01-31 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $150 - Warning $150 R381-100-6(12)(a)-(b) - Children's admission and health assessment reviewed, updated, signed, and on-site The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not having the children's admission and health assessment reviewed, signed and updated by the parents within the last year. At the facility, there was an admission and health assessment form not reviewed, updated and signed annually. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 1/31/2024, the licensor verified the child's admission and health assessment form had been reviewed, updated, and signed by the parent as stated in rule. |
||
If you are a provider and believe any information is incorrect, please contact us. We will research your concern and make corrections accordingly.
Viewing an Infant Daycare?