Description: Critchlow, Ambure is a Residential Certificate in Ogden UT, with a maximum capacity of 8 children. The provider does not participate in a subsidized child care program.
Where possible, ChildcareCenter provides inspection reports as a service to families. This information is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed. We encourage families to contact the daycare provider directly with any questions or concerns, as the provider may have already addressed some or all issues. Reports can also be verified with your local daycare licensing office.
| Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Corrections |
|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-26 | Announced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2020-11-13 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2020-10-09 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2020-10-09 |
|
Finds:
Repeat Citation - Moderate 50-13(4); choking hazards The provider did not comply with the Child Safety and Injury Prevention rule by having choking hazards accessible to children younger than 3 years of age. In the playroom, there were small toys and broken crayons. This was a repeat citation. |
||
| 2020-05-12 | Announced | |
| 2020-05-12 | Announced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2019-09-18 | Non On-Site Inspection | |
| 2019-09-03 | Follow-Up, Non On-Site | Correction Verified: 2019-09-18 |
|
Finds:
Repeat Citation - Moderate 50-8(1)(a)-(d); background check - new covered individual The provider did not comply with the Background Checks rule by not submitting required fingerprints for a covered individual who turned 18 years old. At the time of the inspection, one covered individual had turned 18 and had not submitted the required fingerprints. This was a repeat rule violation. |
||
| 2019-09-03 | Non On-Site Inspection | Correction Verified: 2019-09-18 |
|
Finds:
Repeat Citation - Moderate 50-8(1)(a)-(d); background check - new covered individual The provider did not comply with the Background Checks rule by not submitting required fingerprints for a covered individual who turned 18 years old. At the time of the inspection, one covered individual had turned 18 and had not submitted the required fingerprints. This was a repeat rule violation. |
||
| 2019-08-26 | Follow-Up, Non On-Site | Correction Verified: 2019-09-18 |
|
Finds:
Citation - Moderate 50-8(1)(a)-(d); background check - new covered individual The provider did not comply with the Background Checks rule by not submitting required fingerprints for a covered individual who turned 18 years old. At the time of the inspection, one covered individual had turned 18 and had not submitted the required fingerprints. This was a repeat rule violation. |
||
| 2019-08-26 | Non On-Site Inspection | Correction Verified: 2019-09-18 |
|
Finds:
Citation - Moderate 50-8(1)(a)-(d); background check - new covered individual The provider did not comply with the Background Checks rule by not submitting required fingerprints for a covered individual who turned 18 years old. At the time of the inspection, one covered individual had turned 18 and had not submitted the required fingerprints. This was a repeat rule violation. |
||
| 2019-08-14 | Unannounced | |
| 2019-08-14 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2019-06-25 | Non On-Site Inspection | |
| 2019-03-22 | Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2019-03-04 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2019-03-04 |
|
Finds:
Repeat Citation - Moderate 50-13(4); choking hazards The provider did not comply with the Child Safety and Injury Prevention rule by having choking hazards accessible to children younger than 3 years of age. In the outdoor play area, there were pieces of broken plastic, broken crayons, a paper clip and a game piece on the ground. This was a repeat rule violation. |
||
If you are a provider and you believe any information is incorrect, please contact us. We will research your concern and make corrections accordingly.
Be the first to review this childcare provider. Write a review about Critchlow, Ambure. Let other families know what’s great, or what could be improved. Please read our brief review guidelines to make your review as helpful as possible.
