Child Care Center
✓ Licensed
Boys and Girls Club Mt. Logan Childcare
Logan, UT
· Cache County
179 E 800 N,
Logan, UT 84321
Quick Facts
Capacity
42 children
Age Range
Five Year Olds,Four Year Olds,Infants (0-11 months),School Age (6-12 Year Olds),Three Year Olds,Toddlers (12-23 months),Two Year Olds
Type of Care
Full Time,Part Time,After School,After School Early Day,Open School Holidays,Preschool Program (2-4 hours daily),Rotating Shifts,School-Age Summer Care,Year Round
Transportation
Smoke-free Environment,Near Public Transportation,No Pets
Subsidized Program
Participates
State Rating
Default Foundation of Quality
Missing details such as rates? Suggest an update to help other families.
Licensed Child Care Center
Active License
License Number
F24-116878
Licensed Since
2025
License Issued
Feb 1, 2026
Active Through
Jan 31, 2027
Issued By
Utah Department of Health
District Office
Utah Child Care Licensing
Reviews
Write a Review
Be the first to review this childcare provider. Write a review about Boys and Girls Club Mt. Logan Childcare. Let other families know what's great, or what could be improved. Please read our brief review guidelines to make your review as helpful as possible.
Review Policy: ChildcareCenter.us does not actively screen or monitor user reviews, nor do we verify or edit content.
Reviews reflect only the opinion of the writer. We ask that users follow our
review guidelines.
Providers are welcome to respond to parental reviews, however we ask that they identify themselves as the provider.
About the Provider
Boys and Girls Club Mt. Logan Childcare is a Child Care Center in Logan UT, with a maximum capacity of 42 children. This child care center helps with children in the age range of Five Year Olds,Four Year Olds,Infants (0-11 months),School Age (6-12 Year Olds),Three Year Olds,Toddlers (12-23 months),Two Year Olds. It is open Monday - Friday, 7:00 AM - 6:00 PM. The provider also participates in a subsidized child care program.
Hours of Operation
- Monday7:00 AM - 6:00 PM
- Tuesday7:00 AM - 6:00 PM
- Wednesday7:00 AM - 6:00 PM
- Thursday7:00 AM - 6:00 PM
- Friday7:00 AM - 6:00 PM
- Saturday Closed
- Sunday Closed
Inspection/Report History
Where possible, ChildcareCenter provides inspection reports as a service to families. This information is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed. We encourage families to contact the daycare provider directly with any questions or concerns. Reports can also be verified with your local daycare licensing office.
| Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Corrections |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-16 | Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2026-04-06 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2026-04-16 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $200 - Warning $200 R381-100-11(1)(a)-(g) - Provide and maintain active supervision The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-11(1)(e) by not providing and maintaining active supervision of each child, including knowing the number of children in their care at any time. In the 2 and older classroom, the caregiver did not know the number of children in their care when the licensor asked them how many children they had in their care. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 3/9/2026. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 4/6/2026, the licensor verified that the caregiver acknowledged the child in the bathroom, recounted, and then knew the number of children in their care as stated in rule. On 4/16/2026, the licensor verified that the caregivers knew the number of children in their care as stated in rule. |
||
| 2026-04-06 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2026-04-16 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $150 - Warning $150 R381-100-13(4) - Choking hazards inaccessible to children under 3 The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-13(4) by not ensuring that choking hazards were inaccessible to children younger than three years old. In the 2 and older classroom, there were two loose marker caps on the floor and many small plastic letters on a table, which were choking hazards, and there were no caregivers supervising their use. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 12/18/2025 and 3/9/2026. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 4/6/2026, the licensor verified that the caregiver made the choking hazards inaccessible as stated in rule. On 4/16/2026, the licensor verified that the correction had been maintained as stated in rule. |
||
| 2026-04-06 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2026-04-16 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R381-100-10(2)(a)-(d) - Mixed age group ratios and group size The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-10(2)(a)(b) by not maintaining at least the number of required caregivers and by exceeding the number of children in the caregiver-to-child ratio for a mixed age group of children. In the infant/toddler room, the provider did not maintain at least the number of required caregivers, and they exceeded the number of children in the caregiver-to-child ratio. This was a repeat noncompliance as noted on 6/12/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 4/16/2026, the licensor verified that there were two caregivers with five infants/ toddlers in the infant room as stated in rule. |
||
| 2026-03-09 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2026-04-06 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $150 - Warning $150 R381-100-24(13)(a)-(d) - Baby food, formula, breast milk brought from home requirements The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-24(13)(b) by not ensuring that breast milk brought from home for an individual child's use was labeled with the date of preparation or arrival on it. In the infant -2 room refrigerator, there was a bottle of breast milk from home for one infant that had not been labeled with the date it had been prepared or had arrived on it. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 6/12/2025 and 12/18/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 4/6/2026, the licensor verified that the breast milk from home for the infant was labeled with the required information as stated in rule. |
||
| 2026-03-09 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2026-04-06 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-15(13)(a)-(f) - Child handwashing requirements The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-15(13)(f) by not ensuring that children washed their hands thoroughly with liquid soap and running water when coming in from outdoors. In the preschool room, the children in the care of the substitute caregiver did not wash their hands when they came in from outdoors. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 12/18/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 4/6/2026, the licensor verified that the caregiver washed the children's hands before their meal as stated in rule. |
||
| 2026-03-09 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2026-04-06 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-13(9)(a)-(d) - Toxic/hazardous chemical requirements The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-13(9)(b) by not ensuring that hazardous chemicals were inaccessible to children. In the lobby, where the children pass by on their way to the bathrooms, there was a container of bleach wipes in a low drawer, accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 12/18/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 3/9/2026, the licensor verified that the director designee made the hazardous chemicals inaccessible as stated in rule. |
||
| 2026-03-09 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2026-03-09 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-13(4) - Choking hazards inaccessible to children under 3 The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-13(4) by not ensuring that choking hazards were inaccessible to children younger than three years old. In the Reading room and in the preschool room, where there were 2 year old children, there were choking hazards on the floor and in bins on shelves, accessible to children younger than three years old. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 12/18/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 3/9/2026, the licensor verified that the director designee made the choking hazards inaccessible as stated in rule. |
||
| 2026-03-09 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2026-04-06 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-13(3) - Sharp objects inaccessible The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-13(3) by not ensuring that any sharp object, edge, corner, or point that could cut or puncture skin was inaccessible to children. In the Reading room, there was a container of push pins on a shelf, accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 12/18/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 3/9/2026, the licensor verified that the director designee made the sharp objects inaccessible as stated in rule. |
||
| 2026-03-09 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-11(1)(a)-(g) - Provide and maintain active supervision The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-11(1)(a)(e) by not ensuring that each caregiver provided and maintained active supervision of each child, including knowing the number of children in their care at any time and being physically present in the room or area with the children for children younger than five years old. In the infant-2 room, the caregiver did not know the number of children in their care. In the preschool room, the caregivers were being forced to allow the 2 year old children to leave the room and go across the hallway to the bathroom by themselves since there were no extra staff to help with their toileting needs. |
||
| 2026-03-09 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2026-04-06 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $200 - Warning $200 R381-100-8(2)(a)-(c) - New covered individual background check The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-8(2)(c) by not ensuring that a new covered individual only was allowed to be involved with child care in the program if they had an eligible OBP background check determination. At the facility, there was an individual who had been involved with child care in the program, and they did not receive an eligible determination from OBP. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 6/12/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 4/6/2026, the licensor verified that the individual had been disassociated with the facility so this is corrected as stated in rule. |
||
| 2026-01-22 | Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2026-01-06 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2026-01-22 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $200 - Warning $200 R381-100-10(3)(a)-(c) - Infants and toddlers in a mixed age group The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-10(3)(a) by not ensuring that for a mixed age group of children that included infants or toddlers, that there were at least two caregivers if the group had more than three children younger than two years old. In the toddler room, there was just one caregiver in the mixed age group of younger toddlers, older toddlers, and two year old children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 12/18/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 1/22/2026, the licensor verified that the provider had moved the 2 year old children from the toddler room into the preschool classroom and the toddler in care into the infant/toddler room, so that they were in ratio and not over group size as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-12-18 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-12-18 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-10(3)(a)-(c) - Infants and toddlers in a mixed age group The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-13(3)(a)-(c) by not ensuring that for a mixed age group of children that included toddlers, that there was no more than three children younger than two years old in the group with one caregiver. In the Toddler room, there was one caregiver with one two year old, three older toddlers and one younger toddler. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 12/18/2025, the licensor verified that the director added a second caregiver to be in ratio with the group as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-07-10 | Follow-Up Inspection, Non On-Site Inspection | |
| 2025-07-08 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-07-10 |
|
Finds: CITED - Low - Warning $100 R381-100-14(9) - Fire/disaster drill documentation kept onsite The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-14(9) by not keeping documentation of the previous 12 months of disaster drills onsite for review by OL. At the time of the inspection, there was no documentation onsite of the previous 12 months of disaster drills. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 6/12/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 7/10/2025, the licensor verified that the director had the disaster drills onsite as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-06-12 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-06-12 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-24(13)(a)-(d) - Baby food, formula, breast milk brought from home requirements The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-24(13)(a)(b) by not ensuring that formula or breast milk brought from home for an individual child's use was labeled with the child's name, the date, and the time or preparation or arrival time on it. In the infant/toddler room, there were bags and bottles of breast milk and bottles of formula that were not labeled with the child's name, the date, and the time they had been prepared or had arrived at the facility on them for four infants. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 6/12/2025, the licensor verified that the caregiver labeled the bags/bottles of breast milk and formula with the required information as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-06-12 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-06-12 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-19(13) - Adequate protective cushioning The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-19(13) by not ensuring that protective cushioning covered the entire use zone and that it's depth or thickness was determined by the highest designated play surface. On the playground, there was a piece of stationary play equipment that did not have protective cushioning in it's use zone, based on the height of the designated play surface. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 6/12/2025, the licensor verified that the director made the play equipment inaccessible as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-06-12 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-06-12 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-13(11)(a)-(b) - Electrical shock items protected The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-13(11)(b) by not ensuring that electrical outlets without a protective cap or safety device were inaccessible to children younger than five years old. In the infant/toddler room, there was an electrical outlet without a protective cap or safety device accessible to children younger than five years old. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 6/12/2025, the licensor verified that the director designee covered the electrical outlet with a safety device as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-06-12 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-06-12 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-13(8) - Standing water inaccessible The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-13(8) by not ensuring that standing water that measured two inches or deeper and five by five inches or greater in diameter was inaccessible to children. In the 2 and older classroom, there was a bucket of soapy water that exceeded two inches in depth and was greater than five by five inches in diameter accessible to children. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 6/12/2024, the licensor verified that the caregiver made the bucket of water inaccessible as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-06-12 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-07-08 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-10(2)(a)-(d) - Mixed age group ratios and group size The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-10(2)(c) by exceeding the maximum group size in a mixed age group of children. In the infant/toddler room, the provider exceeded the maximum group size in the group of infants and toddlers. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 7/8/2025, the licensor verified that the director had the approved ratio of 8 infants/toddlers to 2 caregivers in the infant/toddler room, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-06-12 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-07-08 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-8(2)(a)-(c) - New covered individual background check The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-8(2)(c) by not ensuring that new covered individuals are only allowed to be involved with child care if they have an eligible OBP background check determination. At the time of the inspection, there was an individual involved with child care who had not received an eligible OBP background check determination. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 7/8/2025, the licensor verified that the new covered individual received a cleared background check as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-01-24 | Pre-Inspection | |
If you are a provider and believe any information is incorrect, please contact us. We will research your concern and make corrections accordingly.
Providers in ZIP Code 84321
Viewing an Infant Daycare?
Helpful Resources
Choosing Infant Care
Read article →
Questions to Ask During a Tour
Read article →
Infant Licensing Guide
Read article →