Northstar Preschools - St George
Quick Facts
Missing details such as rates? Suggest an update to help other families.
Reviews
Write a Review
Be the first to review this childcare provider. Write a review about Northstar Preschools - St George. Let other families know what's great, or what could be improved. Please read our brief review guidelines to make your review as helpful as possible.
About the Provider
Hours of Operation
- Monday5:30 AM - 6:30 PM
- Tuesday5:30 AM - 6:30 PM
- Wednesday5:30 AM - 6:30 PM
- Thursday5:30 AM - 6:30 PM
- Friday5:30 AM - 6:30 PM
- Saturday Closed
- Sunday Closed
Inspection/Report History
Where possible, ChildcareCenter provides inspection reports as a service to families. This information is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed. We encourage families to contact the daycare provider directly with any questions or concerns. Reports can also be verified with your local daycare licensing office.
| Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Corrections |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-12 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection | |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-11(1)(a)-(g) - Provide and maintain active supervision The provider was out of compliance with R381-100-11(1)(g) by not ensuring each caregiver provides and maintains active supervision of each child including remaining aware of the entire group of children. During the unannounced on-site complaint investigation inspection conducted on June 12, 2026, the licensing investigator viewed video footage and observed that on multiple occasions, staff members did not remain aware of their entire group of children. This is a repeat noncompliance as noted on March 24, 2023, April 25, 2025 and November 05, 2025. |
||
| 2026-06-12 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection | |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Penalty $600 - Warning $200 R381-100-10(2)(a)-(d) - Mixed age group ratios and group size The provider was out of compliance with R381-100-10(2)(a, b) by not maintaining at least the number of required caregivers and by exceeding the number of children in the caregiver-to-child ratio. On June 12, 2026, during an unannounced on-site complaint investigation, video footage reviewed by the licensing investigator demonstrated that the provider was out of compliance with staff-to-child ratio requirements. The provider failed to ensure the required number of caregivers were present for the number of children in attendance. This is a repeat noncompliance as noted on April 25, 2025, November 5, 2025 and March 26, 2026. |
||
| 2026-06-09 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection | |
|
Finds: CITED - Extreme - Penalty $500 - Warning $500 R380-80-5(10) - Services and supervision to meet each clients needs The provider was out of compliance with R380-80-5(10) for failing to provide supervision that is commensurate with the behaviors and needs of each client. During the inspection, evidence substantiated that an autistic client eloped from staff supervision for approximately 30 minutes unnoticed and was subsequently located by members of the community. Noncompliance was issued to ensure appropriate supervisory measures are implemented moving forward. <br/> |
||
| 2026-04-29 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2026-03-26 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2026-04-29 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $600 - Warning $200 R381-100-10(2)(a)-(d) - Mixed age group ratios and group size The provider was out of compliance with R381-100-10(2) by not ensuring that child-to-caregiver ratios were maintained, and that they separated any single-age group that reaches their maximum group size. In Room Two A, there were 12 older toddlers and one 2 year old with two caregivers. The maximum single age group size for older toddlers is 10, with a 1:5 ratio per caregiver. This was a repeat rule noncompliance, as noted on 04/25/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On March 26, 2026, the licensor verified that the provider opened an additional room and moved three of the older toddlers to the new room with one caregiver, bringing the ratios and group size in Room Two A to 1:5 with 9 older toddlers and one 2 year old with 2 caregivers, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-10-27 | Investigation Inspection | |
| 2025-09-22 | Announced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2025-06-12 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2025-04-25 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-06-12 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-6(12)(a)-(b) - Children's admission and health assessment reviewed, updated, signed, and on-site The Licensee was out of compliance with this rule R381-100-6(12)(a)-(b) by not having complete children's records. In the facility, the admission and health assessment forms for two children had not been reviewed, updated, and signed annually by a parent or guardian. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On June 12, 2025, the licensor verified that the children's records were reviewed, updated, and signed by a parent within the last 12 months, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-25 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-25 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-10(2)(a)-(d) - Mixed age group ratios and group size The Licensee was out of compliance with this rule R381-100-10(2)(a)-(d) by exceeding the number of children in the caregiver-to-child ratio. At the time of the inspection In room 4, the provider was over ratio by one child. The ratio is 1:12 and there were 13 children. In room 7, the provider was over ratio by one child. The ratio is 1:14 and there were 15 children. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On April 25, 2025 The licensors verified that the Licensee came in ratios in each class room as stated in rule |
||
| 2025-04-25 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-25 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-11(1)(a)-(f) - Provide and maintain active supervision The Licensee was out of compliance with this rule by not providing and maintaining active supervision of each child. In room 6, the caregiver stated she had 14 children in her group. The licensor counted 13 children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on March 24, 2023. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On April 25, 2025, the licensor verified that the caregiver recounted and then knew the number of children in their care as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-25 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-25 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-13(4) - Choking hazards inaccessible to children under 3 The Licensee was out of compliance with this rule R381-100-13(4) by having choking hazards accessible to children younger than three years old. In room 6, there were choking hazards accessible to children younger than three years old. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On April 25, 2025, the licensor verified the Licensee made the choking hazards inaccessible to children as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-25 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-25 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-13(9)(a)-(d) - Toxic/hazardous chemical requirements The Licensee was out of compliance with rule R381-100-13(9)(a)-(d), by not ensuring that hazardous chemicals were inaccessible. In room 7 and 8 there were cleaning products under the sink in an accessible cupboard |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On April 25, 2025, the licensor verified that the provider made the cleaning products inaccessible, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-25 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-06-12 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-19(14)(a)-(c) - Sand, gravel, shredded tires cushioning requirements The Licensee was out of compliance with rule R381-100-19(14)(a)-(c) by not ensuring that protective cushioning met the required depth. On the Big Playground, the gravel used as cushioning measured at an average depth of 5.33 inches deep. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on September 09, 2023. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On June 12, 2025, the licensor verified that the cushioning met the required depth, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-25 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-06-12 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-24(13)(a)-(d) - Baby food, formula, breast milk brought from home requirements The Licensee was out of compliance with rule R381-100-24(13) by not ensuring baby food, formula, or breast milk that is brought from home is properly labeled. In the infant's classroom there were bottles not labeled with the child's name or the date and time of preparation. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On June 12, 2025, the licensor verified that food, prepared formulas, and breast milk brought from home were properly labeled with the name of the child, and the date and time of preparation, as stated in rule |
||
| 2024-09-30 | Non On-Site Inspection | |
| 2024-09-26 | Announced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2024-02-27 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2023-09-20 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2023-08-15 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2023-09-20 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate R381-100-19(14)(a)-(c) - Sand, gravel, shredded tires cushioning requirements The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that protective cushioning met the required depth. On the Big Playground, the gravel used as cushioning measured at an average depth of 4 inches deep. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
If you are a provider and believe any information is incorrect, please contact us. We will research your concern and make corrections accordingly.
Providers in ZIP Code 84770
Viewing an Infant Daycare?