Melba S. Lehner Children's School-Weber State University
Quick Facts
Missing details such as rates? Suggest an update to help other families.
Reviews
Write a Review
Be the first to review this childcare provider. Write a review about Melba S. Lehner Children's School-Weber State University. Let other families know what's great, or what could be improved. Please read our brief review guidelines to make your review as helpful as possible.
About the Provider
Hours of Operation
- Monday8:00 AM - 5:00 PM
- Tuesday8:00 AM - 5:00 PM
- Wednesday8:00 AM - 5:00 PM
- Thursday8:00 AM - 5:00 PM
- Friday8:00 AM - 5:00 PM
- Saturday Closed
- Sunday Closed
Inspection/Report History
Where possible, ChildcareCenter provides inspection reports as a service to families. This information is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed. We encourage families to contact the daycare provider directly with any questions or concerns. Reports can also be verified with your local daycare licensing office.
| Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Corrections |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-02 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2025-08-08 | Pre-Inspection | |
| 2025-04-21 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2025-04-02 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-02 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-17(1) - Nonrefrigerated medications requirements The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-17(1) by not ensuring that nonrefrigerated medications were locked or stored above 48 inches above the floor. In the Purple room, there was bottle of medication on a shelf in an unlocked cabinet, accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 3/25/2024. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 4/2/2025, the licensor verified that the director made the medication inaccessible as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-02 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-02 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Penalty $150 - Warning $150 R381-100-13(9)(a)-(d) - Toxic/hazardous chemical requirements The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-13(9)(a) by not ensuring that hazardous chemicals were inaccessible to children. In the Yellow room, there was a bottle of dish detergent on the side of the sink, accessible to children. In the Purple room, there was an unlocked cabinet under the sink which contained several bottles of various cleansers, accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 11/15/2022 and 4/25/2023. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 4/2/2025, the licensor verified that the caregiver and director made the hazardous chemicals inaccessible as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-02 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-02 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-13(4) - Choking hazards inaccessible to children under 3 The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-13(4) by not ensuring that choking hazards were inaccessible to children younger than three years old. In the Green room, where there were children younger than three years old, there were several broken crayons in a bin on a shelf, accessible to children younger than three years old. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 3/25/2024. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 4/2/2025, the licensor verified that the director made the choking hazards inaccessible as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-02 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-02 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Penalty $150 - Warning $150 R381-100-13(3) - Sharp objects inaccessible The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-13(3) by not ensuring that sharp objects, edges, corners, or points that could cut or puncture skin were inaccessible to children. In the Purple room, there was a pair adult size scissors on a low counter, accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 11/15/2022 and 10/15/2024. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 4/2/2025, the licensor verified that the director made the sharp object inaccessible as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-10-22 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2024-10-15 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-10-15 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $600 - Warning $200 R381-100-11(1)(a)-(f) - Provide and maintain active supervision The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that caregivers provided and maintained active supervision of each child including for children younger than five years old, a caregiver was physically present in the room or area with the children. In the outdoor playground area, there were three children in a fenced playground that was adjacent to another playground area that had caregivers and other children, and there were no caregivers physically present in that area with the three children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 10/15/2024, the licensor verified that a caregiver went into the playground to supervise the three children as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-04-18 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2024-03-25 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-04-18 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-8(2)(a)-(d) - New covered individual background check The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not receiving written notice from CCL that a new covered individual was eligible before they became involved with child care in the program. At the time of the inspection, there were two individuals involved with child care in the program who did not receive written notification from CCL that the individuals were eligible. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 4/18/2024, the licensor verified that both of the individuals had received notice of a passed background check as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-03-14 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection Complaint Date: 2024-02-26 |
Correction Verified: 2024-03-14 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-11(1)(a)-(f) - Provide and maintain active supervision The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring all children were actively supervised. In the 2's/3's classroom, the children were not actively supervised by the caregivers who were positioned to where they could not see all children resulting in a child receiving multiple bites on their back. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 03/14/2024, the licensor verified that the director ensured that active supervision procedures include the caregivers position so that all children are actively supervised as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-01-29 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection Complaint Date: 2024-01-29 |
Correction Verified: 2024-01-29 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-6(3) - No conduct adverse to children allowed The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not taking the necessary steps to protect the children in care. In the facility, while a caregiver was assisting a child with a dress up garment, the child fell off of the elevated surface of the diaper changing table and received a concussion when they landed on the floor. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 01/29/2024, the licensor verified that the director had retrainied caregivers to ensure all children are protected from conduct that endangers them as stated in rule. |
||
| 2023-11-09 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2023-10-12 | Pre-Inspection | |
If you are a provider and believe any information is incorrect, please contact us. We will research your concern and make corrections accordingly.
Nearby Providers
Looking for Child Care?