Description: Grow, Stephanie is a Licensed Family Child Care in West Valley City UT, with a maximum capacity of 16 children. The provider does not participate in a subsidized child care program.
Where possible, ChildcareCenter provides inspection reports as a service to families. This information is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed. We encourage families to contact the daycare provider directly with any questions or concerns, as the provider may have already addressed some or all issues. Reports can also be verified with your local daycare licensing office.
| Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Corrections |
|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-28 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2020-11-30 | Announced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2020-08-26 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2019-12-23 | Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2019-12-18 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2019-12-18 |
|
Finds:
Repeat Citation - High 90-10(1); ratios The provider did not comply with the Ratios rule by not maintaining at least 1 caregiver for up to 8 children in care and at least 2 caregivers for 9 to 16 children in care. At the time of the inspection, the provider was transporting children and had left the 16 year old daughter/caregiver in charge of 10 children, with 3 children under the age of 2. This was a repeat rule violation. |
||
| 2019-12-18 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2019-12-18 |
|
Finds:
Repeat Citation - High 90-10(3)(a)-(c); number of children younger than 2 The provider did not comply with the Ratios rule by caring for 3 children under the age of 2 with only one caregiver present. At the time of the inspection, the 16 year old caregiver was alone with 3 children under the age of 2 with 7 other children. |
||
| 2019-12-18 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2019-12-18 |
|
Finds:
Citation - Moderate 90-10(5); 16 and 17 year old caregivers count in ratios The provider did not comply with the Ratios rule by having a caregiver who was 16 years old included in the caregiver-to-child ratio when there was not a caregiver who was at least 18 years old on the premises. At the time of the inspection, there was a 16 year old caregiver providing care for 10 children, with 3 under the age of 2, without a second caregiver who was at least 18 years old. |
||
| 2019-12-18 | Follow-Up, First | Correction Verified: 2019-12-18 |
|
Finds:
Repeat Citation - High 90-10(1); ratios The provider did not comply with the Ratios rule by not maintaining at least 1 caregiver for up to 8 children in care and at least 2 caregivers for 9 to 16 children in care. At the time of the inspection, the provider was transporting children and had left the 16 year old daughter/caregiver in charge of 10 children, with 3 children under the age of 2. This was a repeat rule violation. |
||
| 2019-12-18 | Follow-Up, First | Correction Verified: 2019-12-18 |
|
Finds:
Repeat Citation - High 90-10(3)(a)-(c); number of children younger than 2 The provider did not comply with the Ratios rule by caring for 3 children under the age of 2 with only one caregiver present. At the time of the inspection, the 16 year old caregiver was alone with 3 children under the age of 2 with 7 other children. |
||
| 2019-12-18 | Follow-Up, First | Correction Verified: 2019-12-18 |
|
Finds:
Citation - Moderate 90-10(5); 16 and 17 year old caregivers count in ratios The provider did not comply with the Ratios rule by having a caregiver who was 16 years old included in the caregiver-to-child ratio when there was not a caregiver who was at least 18 years old on the premises. At the time of the inspection, there was a 16 year old caregiver providing care for 10 children, with 3 under the age of 2, without a second caregiver who was at least 18 years old. |
||
| 2019-11-25 | Announced | Correction Verified: 2019-12-18 |
|
Finds:
Citation - Moderate 90-14(5); conduct disaster drills once every 12 months The provider did not comply with the Emergency Preparedness and Response requirements. At the time of the inspection, fire drills were not conducted quarterly. This was a repeat rule violation. |
||
| 2019-11-25 | Announced | Correction Verified: 2019-11-25 |
|
Finds:
Citation - Moderate 90-19(8); stationary play equipment not on hard surface The provider did not comply with the Play Equipment rule by having stationary play equipment with a designated play surface that measures 6 inches or higher placed on a hard surface. In the outdoor play area, the teeter totter was placed on cement. This was a repeat rule violation. |
||
| 2019-11-25 | Announced | Correction Verified: 2019-11-25 |
|
Finds:
Repeat Citation - Moderate 90-13(4); choking hazards The provider did not comply with the Child Safety and Injury Prevention rule by having choking hazards accessible to children younger than 3 years of age. In the kitchen and upstairs bathroom, there were screws, other small hardware and hair elastics accessible. This was a repeat rule violation. |
||
| 2019-11-25 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2019-12-18 |
|
Finds:
Citation - Moderate 90-14(5); conduct disaster drills once every 12 months The provider did not comply with the Emergency Preparedness and Response requirements. At the time of the inspection, fire drills were not conducted quarterly. This was a repeat rule violation. |
||
| 2019-11-25 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2019-11-25 |
|
Finds:
Citation - Moderate 90-19(8); stationary play equipment not on hard surface The provider did not comply with the Play Equipment rule by having stationary play equipment with a designated play surface that measures 6 inches or higher placed on a hard surface. In the outdoor play area, the teeter totter was placed on cement. This was a repeat rule violation. |
||
If you are a provider and you believe any information is incorrect, please contact us. We will research your concern and make corrections accordingly.
Be the first to review this childcare provider. Write a review about Grow, Stephanie. Let other families know what’s great, or what could be improved. Please read our brief review guidelines to make your review as helpful as possible.
