Ewing, Chani dba Chanis Daycare
Quick Facts
Missing details such as rates? Suggest an update to help other families.
Reviews
Write a Review
Be the first to review this childcare provider. Write a review about Ewing, Chani dba Chanis Daycare. Let other families know what's great, or what could be improved. Please read our brief review guidelines to make your review as helpful as possible.
About the Provider
Hours of Operation
- Monday6:00 AM - 7:00 PM
- Tuesday6:00 AM - 7:00 PM
- Wednesday6:00 AM - 7:00 PM
- Thursday6:00 AM - 7:00 PM
- Friday6:00 AM - 7:00 PM
- Saturday Closed
- Sunday Closed
Inspection/Report History
Where possible, ChildcareCenter provides inspection reports as a service to families. This information is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed. We encourage families to contact the daycare provider directly with any questions or concerns. Reports can also be verified with your local daycare licensing office.
| Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Corrections |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-18 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2025-11-17 | Pre-Inspection | |
| 2025-05-13 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2025-04-30 | Focus Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-30 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R430-90-9(14)(a)-(b) - 4 foot high fence for traffic The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-9(14)(a)-(b) by not ensuring that the outdoor area is enclosed within a fence, wall, or solid natural barrier that is at least four feet high. At the time of inspection, the fencing along the outdoor play area was not 48 inches high along the length of the fence. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on: 8/23/2024 and 2/24/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 4/30/2025, the licensor verified that the Licensee ensured the outdoor area was enclosed within a fence, wall, or solid natural barrier that is at least four feet high, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-30 | Focus Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-30 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-7(1) - Provider or designee present The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-7-90(1) by not having a provider designee present at the home when the provider is not there and children are in care. At the time of inspection, there was not a provider designee on-site when the Licensee was transporting children. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 4/30/2025, the licensor verified that the Licensee ensured after returning from the bus run, that the provider or provider designee were present at the home when a child was in care. |
||
| 2025-04-30 | Focus Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-30 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $300 - Warning $150 R430-90-13(4) - choking hazards The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-13(4) by having choking hazards accessible to children younger than three years old. In the living room, there were small hair elastics accessible. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on: 2/27/2024, 3/12/2024, 8/23/2024, 2/24/2025, and 3/12/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On April 30, 2025, the licensor verified that the Licensee ensured choking hazards were inaccessible to children younger than three years old, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-30 | Focus Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-30 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $300 - Warning $150 R430-90-13(3) - sharp objects, edges, corners, points The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-13(3) by having sharp objects accessible to children. In the kitchen, there were 3 knives on the kitchen counter. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on: 6/20/2023, 2/27/2024, 3/12/2024, 8/23/2024, and 2/24/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On April 30 2025, the licensor verified that the Licensee ensured sharp objects were made inaccessible, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-30 | Focus Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-30 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R430-90-20(4)(a)-(i) - Driver requirements The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-20(4)(a)-(i) by not ensuring that each child being transported was in an individual safety restraint that was used according to Utah law. While the Licensee was transporting children from school back to the facility, there were 16 children in a 15 passenger van. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 2/3/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On April 30, 2025, the licensor verified that the Licensee ensured each child being transported was in an individual safety restraint that was used according to Utah law, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-30 | Focus Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-30 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $300 - Warning $150 R430-90-13(9)(a)-(d) - toxic and hazardous chemicals The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-13(9)(a)-(d) by having toxic or hazardous chemicals accessible. In the kitchen, there was a bottle of motor oil, in the pantry, there was a container of disinfecting wipes, and in the living room, there was a container of disinfecting wipes. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on: 6/20/2023, 2/27/2024, 8/23/2024,and 2/24/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On April 30, 2025, the licensor verified that the Licensee ensured toxic or hazardous materials were made inaccessible, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-30 | Focus Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-30 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $150 - Warning $150 R430-90-13(7) - empty plastic bags, latex gloves, balloons The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-13(7) by having empty plastic bags large enough for a child's head to fit inside accessible to children younger than five years old. In the pantry, there was a box of empty garbage bags accessible. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on: 6/20/2023, 2/27/2024, 8/23/2024, 2/24/2025, and 3/12/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On April 30 2025, the licensor verified that the Licensee ensured empty plastic bags were made inaccessible, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-30 | Focus Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-30 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-23(7)(a)-(c) - Disposal of wet and soiled diapers The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-23(7)(a)-(c) by not ensuring that caregivers place wet and soiled disposable diapers in a container that has a disposable plastic lining and a tight-fitting lid. In the bathroom, there was a wet diaper in a trash can without a tight fitting lid. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On April 30, 2025, the licensor verified that the Licensee ensured caregivers placed wet and soiled disposable diapers in a container that has a disposable plastic lining and a tight-fitting lid, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-30 | Focus Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-30 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R430-90-10(3)(a)-(c) - Number of children younger than 2 The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-10(3)(a)-(c) by not ensuring that there was at least one caregiver for every three children younger than two years old. At the time inspection, the Licensee was alone and had 6 children under the age of 2 years old. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on: 6/20/2023, 7/3/2023, 2/27/2024, and 3/12/2024. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On April 30 2025, the licensor verified that the Licensee ensured ratios for children younger than two years old was maintained after returning from the bus run, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-30 | Focus Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-30 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Penalty $200 - Warning $200 R430-90-10(1)(a)-(b) - Ratios The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-10(1)(a)-(b) by not maintaining at least one caregiver for up to eight children in care. At the time of the inspection, the Licensee had 16 children with no additional caregivers. Also, during the inspection at 11:00 am, the Licensee left to take children to school. The Licensee took 12 children with them in the vehicle alone with no additional caregivers. The Licensee then returned to the facility at 12:00 pm with 16 children and no additional caregivers. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On April 30 2025, the licensor verified that the Licensee maintained ratios after returning from the bus run, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-30 | Focus Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-30 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Penalty $200 - Warning $200 R430-90-10(4) - Group sizes The Licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-10(4) by exceeding the maximum group size. At the time of inspection, the Licensee had 18 children in care by themselves. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On April 30 2025, the licensor verified the Licensee ensured that they did not exceed the maximum group sizes, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-04-03 | Non On-Site Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-04-30 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-7(4)(a)-(g) - Caregiver requirements The Licensee was out of compliance for R430-90-7(4)(g) by not ensuring that caregivers complete at least 20 hours of child care training each year. At the time of inspection, the provider and 2 caregivers had less than 20 annual training hours. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on: 2/24/2024. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 4/23/2025, the licensor verified the Licensee ensured that each caregiver completed 20 hours of annual training, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-03-20 | Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2025-03-12 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-03-12 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-13(7) - empty plastic bags, latex gloves, balloons The licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-13(7)by having empty plastic bags large enough for a child's head to fit inside accessible to children younger than five years old. In the living room, there were diaper garbage bags accessible. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on: 6/20/2023, 2/27/2024, 8/23/2024, and 2/24/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 3/12/2025, the licensor verified the licensee ensured that empty plastic bags large enough for a child's head to fit inside are inaccessible to children younger than five years old, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-03-12 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-03-12 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-13(4) - choking hazards The licensee was out of compliance with R430-90-13(4) by having choking hazards accessible to children younger than three years old. In the living room, there were plastic toys accessible in a diaper bag. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on: 2/27/2024, 3/12/2024, 8/23/2024, and 2/24/2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 3/12/2025, the licensor verified the licensee ensured that choking hazards are inaccessible to children younger than three years old, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-03-05 | Follow-Up Inspection, Non On-Site Inspection | |
| 2025-02-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-03-05 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-6(10)(a)-(m) - Admission and health assessment form contents The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring the paperwork for each child in care included all of the required information. At the time of inspection, the health assessment form for one child was missing all of the information. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On March 05, 2025, the licensor verified that the Licensee ensured each admission form and health assessment form had the required information, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-03-05 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $300 - Warning $150 R430-90-6(9) - admission and health assessment form The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not having required forms for each child enrolled. At the time of the inspection, four children in care did not have the admission and health assessment form. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On March 05, 2025, the licensor verified that the Licensee ensured each child in care had the required paperwork, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-02-24 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $300 - Warning $150 R430-90-13(7) - empty plastic bags, latex gloves, balloons The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having empty plastic bags large enough for a child's head to fit inside accessible to children younger than five years old. In the pantry and in the living room, there were garbage bags accessible. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 2/24/2025, the licensor verified that the provider ensured empty plastic bags large enough for a child's head to fit inside were inaccessible to children younger than five years old, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-02-24 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $300 - Warning $150 R430-90-13(4) - choking hazards The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having choking hazards accessible to children. In the living room, there were hair elastics and plastic toys accessible. In the kitchen, there were cake decorating tips accessible. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 2/24/2025, the licensor verified that the provider ensured choking hazards were inaccessible to children younger than three years old, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-02-24 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $300 - Warning $150 R430-90-13(3) - sharp objects, edges, corners, points The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having sharp objects accessible to children. In the kitchen, there were two mandolin's and a pair of adult scissors accessible. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 2/24/2025, the licensor verified the provider ensured that sharp objects were inaccessible, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-02-24 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Warning $200 R430-90-9(16) - fence gaps The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having a gap five by five inches or greater in or under the fence or barrier. In the outdoor play area, there was a gap larger than five by five inches in a piece of the wood barrier of the play area. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 2/24/2025, the licensor verified that the provider ensured there was no gap five by five inches or greater in or under the fence or barrier, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-02-24 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $300 - Warning $150 R430-90-9(15)(a)-(e) - Hazards that need to be fenced The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having a water hazard, including a creek on or within 100 yards of the property line. In the outdoor area, the creek running behind the outdoor area was accessible. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 2/24/2025, the licensor verified the provider ensured that water hazards within 100 yards of the property line were made inaccessible, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-03-12 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R430-90-9(14)(a)-(b) - 4 foot high fence for traffic The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the outdoor area is enclosed within a fence, wall, or solid natural barrier that is at least four feet high if the facility is on a street or within a half mile of a street that has a speed of 25 miles per hour or higher. At the time of inspection, the fencing along the outdoor play area was not 48 inches high along the length of the fence. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On March 12, 2025, the licensor verified that the licensee ensured the outdoor area was enclosed within a fence, wall, or solid natural barrier that is at least four feet high, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-03-05 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-14(4) - conduct fire drills quarterly The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not conducting fire evacuation drills quarterly. At the time of inspection, the last fire drill conducted was in July 2024. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On March 05, 2025, the licensor verified that the Licensee conducted fire drills quarterly, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-02-24 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $300 - Warning $150 R430-90-13(9)(a)-(d) - toxic and hazardous chemicals The licensor was out of compliance with this rule by having toxic or hazardous chemicals accessible. In the pantry, there was a bottle of motor oil accessible and in the outdoor play area, there was a bottle of windshield fluid accessible. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 2/24/2025, the licensor verified that the provider ensured toxic or hazardous chemicals were inaccessible, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-02-24 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R430-90-19(14) - Crush, shearing, sharp edge hazards The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having crush hazards on or within the use zone of any piece of stationary play equipment. In the outdoor play area, there was a disc swing tied to a tree that did not have the proper use zone. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 2/24/2025, the licensor verified that the provider ensured there are no crush, shearing, or sharp edge hazards on or within the use zone of any piece of stationary play equipment, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-03-12 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R430-90-19(13) - strangulation hazards The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having strangulation hazards on or within the use zone of any piece of stationary play equipment. In the outdoor play area, the handles at the top of the rock climbing wall were loose, creating a gap larger than .04 of an inch. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On March 12, 2025, the licensor verified that the licensee ensured there were no strangulation hazards on or within the use zone of any piece of stationary play equipment, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-02-24 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-19(3)(a)-(c) - 3 foot use zone, stable and securely anchored The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not having a 3 foot use zone or cushioning around the stationary play equipment. In the outdoor play area, there was a roll of turf within the use zone of the swing set. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 2/24/2025, the licensor verified that the provider ensured stationary play equipment had a 3 foot use zone, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-03-12 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-17(1) - medications inaccessible The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having medications accessible to children in care. At the time of inspection, there were medications and vitamin supplements accessible in the kitchen and living room. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On March 12, 2025, the licensor verified that the licensee ensured medications were inaccessible to children in care, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-02-24 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R430-90-24(15) - Infants sleep in equipment designed for sleep The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring infants sleep in equipment designed for sleep. At the time of inspection, the provider stated that infants sleep on the floor. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 2/24/2025, the licensor verified the provider ensured that infants sleep in equipment designed for sleep, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-03 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection Complaint Date: 2025-01-28 |
Correction Verified: 2025-02-03 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-20(2)(a)-(e) - Vehicle used for transporting children The provider was out of compliance with this rule by transporting children in a vehicle that did not have current vehicle registration. At the facility, the provider borrowed a vehicle to transport children, and the vehicle did not have a current vehicle registration. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 02/03/2025, the investigator verified that the provider transported children in a vehicle that had a current registration as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-03 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection Complaint Date: 2025-01-28 |
Correction Verified: 2025-02-03 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R430-90-6(3) - Federal, state, and local laws The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not complying with each applicable federal, state, and local law, ordinance, and rule, regarding the operation of their child care program. At the facility, the provider transported children in a vehicle that was not currently registered, and the children being transported were not in individual safety restraints. The provider was ticketed by law enforcement and the vehicle was impounded. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 02/03/2025, the investigator verified that the provider was in compliance with state law regarding vehicle maintenance and transportation of children as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-02-03 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection Complaint Date: 2025-01-28 |
Correction Verified: 2025-02-03 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R430-90-20(4)(a)-(i) - Driver requirements The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring each child being transported was in an individual safety restraint. At the facility, the provider transported 6 children in a vehicle with 5 seats, and the children in the back seat of the vehicle were doubled buckled in their seat belts. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 02/03/2025, the investigator verified that the provider ensured that children would be transported in individual safety restraints as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-10-07 | Non On-Site Inspection | |
| 2024-09-19 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-10-07 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-20(2)(a)-(e) - Vehicle used for transporting children The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the vehicle used to transport children had current registration. At the time of inspection, the vehicle used to transport children did not have current registration. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 10/7/2024, the licensor verified that the provider ensured the vehicle used to transport children had current registration, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-09-19 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-10-07 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $200 - Warning $200 R430-90-19(13) - strangulation hazards The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having strangulation hazards on or within the use zone of any piece of stationary play equipment. In the outdoor play area, bolts securing the tube slide together were missing, creating a gap larger than .04 of an inch. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 10/7/2024, the licensor verified that the provider ensured there were no strangulation hazards on or within the use zone of any piece of stationary play equipment, as stated in rule |
||
| 2024-08-23 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-08-23 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R430-90-9(14)(a)-(b) - 4 foot high fence for traffic The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the outdoor area is enclosed within a fence, wall, or solid natural barrier that is at least four feet high if the facility is on a street or within a half mile of a street that has a speed of 25 miles per hour or higher. At the time of inspection, 3 gates leading into the property were left open while children were playing in the outdoor play area. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 8/23/2024, the licensor verified that the provider ensured the outdoor area was enclosed within a fence, wall, or solid natural barrier that is at least four feet high, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-08-23 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-09-19 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R430-90-8(2)(a)-(d) - New covered individual background check The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not submitting an online background check form and fingerprints for individuals age 18 years old and older . At the time of inspection, there were 2 individuals over the age of 18 that had not submitted a background check and fingerprints. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 9/19/2024, the licensor verified that the provider ensured new individuals involved with child care submitted a background form and fingerprints, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-08-23 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-08-23 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R430-90-11(1)(a)-(d) - active supervision The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that caregivers provided and maintained active supervision of each child. At the time of the inspection, there were children younger than 5 years old in the outdoor area without a caregiver. Also, at the time of the inspection, the provider did not know how many children were in care. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 8/24/2024, the licensor verified the provider maintained active supervision of each child, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-08-23 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-09-19 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-13(11)(a)-(b) - live electric wires, electric outlets, surge protectors The provider was out of compliance with this rule having electrical outlets without protective covers when in use accessible to children younger than five years old. In the outdoor area, there were 4 outlets and in the facility, there was one outlet without protective covers. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 9/19/2024, the licensor verified that the provider ensured electric outlets had protective covers when not in use for children under 5 years old, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-08-23 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-09-19 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-13(9)(a)-(d) - toxic and hazardous chemicals The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having toxic or hazardous chemicals accessible to children. In the outdoor area, there were gas cans accessible and in the living room in the facility, there was a can of lubricant spray on the windowsill. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 9/19/2024, the licensor verified that the provider ensured toxic and hazardous chemicals were inaccessible, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-08-23 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-09-19 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-13(7) - empty plastic bags, latex gloves, balloons The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having empty plastic bags large enough for a child's head to fit inside accessible to children younger than five years old. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 9/19/2024, the licensor verified that the provider ensued empty plastic bags were inaccessible to children younger than 5 years old, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-08-23 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-09-19 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-13(4) - choking hazards The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having choking hazards accessible to children. In the outdoor play area, there was a marker lid and other plastic pieces accessible. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 9/19/2024, the licensor verified that the provider ensured choking hazards were inaccessible to children younger than 3 years old, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-08-23 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-09-19 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $150 - Warning $150 R430-90-13(3) - sharp objects, edges, corners, points The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having sharp objects accessible to children. In the outdoor area, there was broken glass on the ground, rose branches with thorns in the use zone of play equipment, and yard clippers accessible. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 9/19/2024, the licensor verified that the provider ensured sharp objects were made inaccessible, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-08-23 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-09-19 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R430-90-19(14) - Crush, shearing, sharp edge hazards The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having crush hazards on or within the use zone of any piece of stationary play equipment. In the outdoor play area, there was a disc swing tied to a tree that did not have the proper use zone. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 9/19/2024, the licensor verified that the provider ensured crush hazards were made inaccessible, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-08-23 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-10-07 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R430-90-19(13) - strangulation hazards The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having strangulation hazards on or within the use zone of any piece of stationary play equipment. In the outdoor play area, the bolts securing the fire pole to the play set were loose, creating a gap larger than .04 of an inch. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 10/7/2024, the licensor verified that the provider ensured there were no strangulation hazards on or within the use zone of any piece of stationary play equipment, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-08-23 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-09-19 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-9(15)(a)-(e) - Hazards that need to be fenced The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having a water hazard, including a creek on or within 100 yards of the property line. In the outdoor area, the creek running behind the outdoor area was accessible. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 9/19/2024, the licensor verified that the provider ensured hazards were separated from the children's outdoor play area, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-03-22 | Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2024-03-12 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-03-12 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-13(3) - sharp objects, edges, corners, points The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having sharp objects accessible to children. In the kitchen, there were staples and screws in an accessible drawer. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 3/12/2024 the licensor verified the provider ensured sharp objects were inaccessible, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-03-12 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-03-12 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R430-90-10(3)(a)-(c) - Number of children younger than 2 The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having 7 children under 2 years old with only 2 caregivers. At the time of inspection, there were 7 children under 2 years old with only 2 caregivers. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 3/12/2024, the licensor verified the provider ensured there was at least one caregiver for every three children younger than two years old; as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-03-12 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-03-22 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-8(3)(a)-(c) - New background check form and fingerprints for updates The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having a covered individual without fingerprints. At the time of inspection, one covered individual who is a volunteer, had not submitted fingerprints. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 3/22/2022, the licensor verified the provider ensured a new background check form and fingerprints were submitted for all covered individuals as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-02-27 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-02-27 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R430-90-24(15) - Infants sleep in equipment designed for sleep The provider was out of compliance with this rule, by having a sleeping infant in equipment that was not designed for sleep. In the kitchen, there was an infant sleeping in a stroller. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 2/27/2024, the licensor verified that the provider ensured that infants sleep in equipment approved for sleeping, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-02-27 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-02-27 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R430-90-13(13) - Weapons The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having weapons accessible to children. At the time of inspection, there were 3 airsoft guns accessible in an unlocked bedroom. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 2/27/2024, the licensor verified the provider ensured that weapons, including airsoft guns, were made inaccessible to children, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-02-27 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-02-27 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R430-90-10(3)(a)-(c) - Number of children younger than 2 The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having 7 children under 2 years old with only 2 caregivers. At the time of inspection, there were 7 children under 2 years old with only 2 caregivers. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 2/27/2024, the licensor verified the provider ensured there was at least one caregiver for every three children younger than two years old; as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-02-27 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-03-12 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R430-90-6(9) - admission and health assessment form The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not having required forms for each child enrolled. At the time of the inspection, two of the providers own children did not have the admission and health assessment form. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 3/12/2024, the licensor verified the provider ensured that each child in care had the required paperwork, as stated in rule. |
||
| 2023-07-26 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2023-07-03 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2023-07-03 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High R430-90-10(3)(a)-(c) - number of children younger than 2 The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having 3 children under 18 months old with only one caregiver. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
| 2023-06-20 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2023-06-20 |
|
Finds: CITED - High R430-90-10(3)(a)-(c) - number of children younger than 2 The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having 3 children under 18 months old with only one caregiver. |
||
If you are a provider and believe any information is incorrect, please contact us. We will research your concern and make corrections accordingly.
Viewing an Infant Daycare?