Child Care Center
✓ Licensed
Bright Kids Academy
West Valley City, UT
· Salt Lake County
3535 S 3200 W,
West Valley City, UT 84119
Quick Facts
Capacity
36 children
Age Range
Five Year Olds,Four Year Olds,Infants (0-11 months),School Age (6-12 Year Olds),Three Year Olds,Toddlers (12-23 months),Two Year Olds
Type of Care
Full Time,Part Time,After School,After School Early Day,Preschool Program (2-4 hours daily)
Transportation
Smoke-free Environment,Near Public Transportation,No Pets
Languages
English, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish
Subsidized Program
Participates
State Rating
Default Foundation of Quality
Missing details such as rates? Suggest an update to help other families.
Licensed Child Care Center
Active License
License Number
F22-90960
Licensed Since
2022
License Issued
Aug 1, 2026
Active Through
Jul 31, 2027
Issued By
Utah Department of Health
District Office
Utah Child Care Licensing
Reviews
Write a Review
Be the first to review this childcare provider. Write a review about Bright Kids Academy. Let other families know what's great, or what could be improved. Please read our brief review guidelines to make your review as helpful as possible.
Review Policy: ChildcareCenter.us does not actively screen or monitor user reviews, nor do we verify or edit content.
Reviews reflect only the opinion of the writer. We ask that users follow our
review guidelines.
Providers are welcome to respond to parental reviews, however we ask that they identify themselves as the provider.
About the Provider
At Bright Kids facility we provide high quality child care and early education at the lowest price in the Valley! At our daycare we want Parents and Kids feel like they are in a magical place to learn and grow, and in a clean and safe environment. Come visit our location in West Valley, meet our teachers, and take advantage of our promotional prices. We have open enrollment from all ages from 0-12yr. See you there!
Hours of Operation
- Monday6:30 AM - 6:00 PM
- Tuesday6:30 AM - 6:00 PM
- Wednesday6:30 AM - 6:00 PM
- Thursday6:30 AM - 6:00 PM
- Friday6:30 AM - 6:00 PM
- Saturday Closed
- Sunday Closed
Inspection/Report History
Where possible, ChildcareCenter provides inspection reports as a service to families. This information is deemed reliable but is not guaranteed. We encourage families to contact the daycare provider directly with any questions or concerns. Reports can also be verified with your local daycare licensing office.
| Inspection Date | Inspection Type | Corrections |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-28 | Follow-Up Inspection, Non On-Site Inspection | |
| 2026-06-30 | Announced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2025-12-02 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2025-11-24 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection Complaint Date: 2025-11-17 |
Manager approval, no follow up needed: 2025-11-24 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $800 - Warning $200 R381-100-10(1)(a)-(c) - Single-age group ratios & group size The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-10(1)(a) by not ensuring the single-age group had the required caregivers. During the inspection, the infant room had six infants total between two rooms with one caregiver present. This is a repeat citation as previously notes on November 03, 2025. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On November 24, 2025, the investigator verified the director arrived to the center to ensure proper ratios as required by rule. |
||
| 2025-11-24 | Complaint, Investigation Inspection Complaint Date: 2025-11-17 |
Manager approval, no follow up needed: 2025-11-24 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R381-100-11(1)(a)-(g) - Provide and maintain active supervision The provider was out of compliance with Rule R381-100-11(1)(a) by not ensuring active supervision and remaining physically present in the room with the children. During the inspection, four infants were sleeping in a room with the door closed without a staff physically present in the room. This is a repeat citation as previously noted on November 03, 2025 and January 30, 2024. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On November 24, 2025, the investigator verified the staff returned to the center to ensure proper ratios and supervision as required by rule. |
||
| 2025-11-19 | Follow-Up Inspection, Non On-Site Inspection | |
| 2025-11-03 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-11-03 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R381-100-10(1)(a)-(c) - Single-age group ratios & group size The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-10(1)(a)-(c) by not ensuring the single-age group had the required caregivers, not exceeding the maximum group size, and to not exceed the number of children in the caregiver-to-child ratio. In the infant room, there were 6 infants and young toddlers with one caregiver. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On November 03, 2025, the licensor verified the provider separated the children and came into child-to-caregiver ratio as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-11-03 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-11-03 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R381-100-8(2)(a)-(c) - New covered individual background check The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-8(2)(d) by allowing a covered individual to become involved with childcare before an eligible background check was received. In the 3-5 room, there was a covered individual without an eligible background check involved with childcare. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 02/01/2023, 01/30/2024, and 12/10/2024. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On November 3, 2025, the licensor verified the caregiver was no longer involved in child care as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-11-03 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-11-03 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R381-100-11(1)(a)-(g) - Provide and maintain active supervision The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-11(1)(a) by not ensuring that each caregiver maintains active supervision of each child by being physically present in the classroom. In the nap room, there was a sleeping infant without a caregiver physically present in the room. In the infant room, the caregiver was not physically present in the room when they went to the nap room. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on 01/30/2024. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On November 3, 2025, the licensor verified the caregivers were physically present in the rooms as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-11-03 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-11-03 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Penalty $200 - Warning $200 R381-100-24(18) - Safe infant sleep equipment The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-24(18) by having an infant sleeping in equipment not designed for sleep. In the nap room, there was an infant sleeping in a swing. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On November 3, 2025, the licensor verified the caregiver woke the infant and removed them from the swing as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-06-30 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2025-05-22 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-06-30 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-6(12)(a)-(b) - Children's admission and health assessment reviewed, updated, signed, and on-site The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-6(12)(a) by having incomplete children's records. At the time of the inspection, a child's admission and health assessment forms had not been reviewed, updated, and signed or initialed at least annually. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on December 10, 2024. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On June 30, 2025, the licensor verified the licensee had the parent or guardian review and sign the child's admission and health form as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-05-22 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-06-30 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-7(7)(a)-(g) - Director designee requirements The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-7(7)(c) by not ensuring that the director designee had a current First Aid and CPR certification. At the facility, the director designee did not have a current First Aid and CPR certification. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On June 30, 2025, the licensor verified the director designee had a current First Aid and CPR certification as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-05-22 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-06-30 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-6(10) - Children's admission and health assessment form completed prior to admittance The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-6(10) by not ensuring that each child had a completed admission and health assessment form before being admitted into the program. At the facility, a child did not have a completed admission and health assessment form and three children did not have completed health assessment forms. This was a repeat rule noncompliance as noted on January 30, 2024. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On June 30, 2025, the licensor verified the licensee had the Children's admission and health assessment form completed prior to admittance as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-05-22 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-06-30 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-23(5) - Diapering surface smooth, waterproof, good repair The provider was out of compliance with rule R381-100-23(5) by not ensuring that the diapering surface is smooth, waterproof, and in good repair. In the infants classroom, the changing pad had several cracks on the surface. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On June 30, 2025, the licensor verified the licensee had the diapering surface smooth, waterproof, good repair as stated in rule. |
||
| 2025-01-14 | Non On-Site Inspection | |
| 2025-01-06 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-01-14 |
|
Finds: CITED - Low - Warning $100 R381-100-24(22)(a)-(c) - Infant/toddler diapering documentation The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not documenting each infant and toddler's diaper change within the hour each day. At the facility, there were records that did not document an infant's diaper changes. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 1/14/2025, the provider sent photos of the diaper log from the previous day and the licensor verified diaper changes were documented within the hour as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-12-10 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-01-06 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-9(19) - No gaps in or under the fence or barrier The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that there is no gap greater than five by five inches in or under the fence. In the outdoor area, there were two areas where there was a gap greater than five by five inches in the fence. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 1/6/2025, the licensor verified there were no gaps in the fence larger than five by five inches as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-12-10 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-12-10 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - High - Penalty $400 - Warning $200 R381-100-8(2)(a)-(d) - New covered individual background check The provider was out of compliance with this rule by allowing individuals to be involved in caregiving duties before submitting an online background check form and fingerprints, and receiving notification of eligibility from OL. In the facility, 2 individuals were involved in childcare before getting notification of clearance by OL. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 12/10/2024, the licensor verified the provider had two caregivers with cleared background checks come to the facility to care for the children. |
||
| 2024-12-10 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-12-10 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $300 - Warning $150 R381-100-13(11)(a)-(b) - Electrical shock items protected The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that all electrical outlets were inaccessible to children younger than 5 years old. In the 3-5 A and B rooms, there were electrical outlets without protective caps covering them. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 12/10/2024, the licensor verified the provider placed protective caps on the outlets as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-12-10 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-12-10 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-13(9)(a)-(d) - Toxic/hazardous chemical requirements The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having toxic or hazardous chemicals accessible to children. In the unlocked kitchen and bathroom, there were cleaners accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 12/10/2024, the licensor verified the provider closed both doors with child locks to make the cleaners inaccessible as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-12-10 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-12-10 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate - Warning $150 R381-100-13(7) - Plastic bags, latex gloves, and balloons inaccessible to under 5 The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having plastic bags large enough to fit a child's head accessible to children younger than five years old. In the Infants room and the Preschool B room, there were plastic bags accessible to children. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 12/10/2024, the licensor verified the provider made the plastic bags inaccessible as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-12-10 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2025-01-06 |
|
Finds: CITED - Low - Warning $100 R381-100-14(9) - Fire/disaster drill documentation kept onsite The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not having the documentation for fire and disaster drills on-site for review. At the facility, there was no documentation on-site for review of the previous 12 months of fire drills. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 12/27/2024, the provider emailed the fire and disaster drills for review as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-07-01 | Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2024-06-18 | Follow-Up Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-07-01 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-23(7) - Children not unattended on diapering surface The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that caregivers do not leave children unattended on the diapering surface. In the Infant's Napping Room, the licensor observed the caregiver leave a child unattended on the diapering surface. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: The licensor verified the caregiver did not leave the child unattended on the diapering surface as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-05-24 | Announced, Annual Inspection | |
| 2024-02-22 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2024-02-13 | Non On-Site Inspection | |
| 2024-01-30 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-01-30 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-11(1)(a)-(f) - Provide and maintain active supervision The provider was out of compliance with this rule by having children who were not actively supervised. In the infants room, there were two children sleeping with the door to the room closed and no caregiver present. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 1/30/2024, the licensor verified the provider moved the children to a room where a caregiver was present as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-01-30 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-01-30 |
|
Finds: CITED - High - Warning $200 R381-100-8(2)(a)-(d) - New covered individual background check The provider was out of compliance with this rule by allowing individuals to be involved in caregiving duties before receiving notification from CCL. In the facility, two individuals were involved in childcare before getting notification of clearance by CCL. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 1/30/2024, the licensor verified the owner of the facility stayed in the classroom with the caregivers as stated in rule. |
||
| 2024-01-30 | Unannounced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2024-01-30 |
|
Finds: REPEAT_CITED - Moderate - Penalty $300 - Warning $150 R381-100-13(11)(a)-(b) - Electrical shock items protected The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that all electrical outlets were inaccessible to children. In the Infant room and 3 and up classrooms, there were electrical outlets without protective caps covering them. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
|
Correction verified by the licensor: On 1/30/2024, the licensor verified the provider placed protective caps on all the outlets as stated in rule. |
||
| 2023-07-27 | Follow-Up Inspection | |
| 2023-07-18 | Announced, Annual Inspection | Correction Verified: 2023-07-18 |
|
Finds: CITED - Moderate R381-100-13(11)(a)-(b) - Electrical shock items protected The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring electrical outlets and surge protectors had protective caps. In the main classroom, there was an outlet that did not have protective cap ion it. This was a repeat rule noncompliance. |
||
If you are a provider and believe any information is incorrect, please contact us. We will research your concern and make corrections accordingly.
Providers in ZIP Code 84119
Viewing an Infant Daycare?
Helpful Resources
Choosing Infant Care
Read article →
Questions to Ask During a Tour
Read article →
Infant Licensing Guide
Read article →