Description: QUALITY ACADEMY HOME DAY CARE is a Four Star Family CC Home License in DURHAM NC, with a maximum capacity of 8 children. The home-based daycare service helps with children in the age range of 0 through 12. The provider also participates in a subsidized child care program.
Where possible, ChildcareCenter provides inspection reports as a service to families. This information is deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed. We encourage families to contact the daycare provider directly with any questions or concerns, as the provider may have already addressed some or all issues. Reports can also be verified with your local daycare licensing office.
| Date | Type | Violations | Rule |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-09 | Unannounced Inspection | No | |
| 2022-11-02 | Unannounced Inspection | Yes | |
| 2022-11-02 | Violation | 714 | 10A NCAC .1721(e)(5)(A-F) |
| Monthly check for hazards on the outdoor play area was not completed using a form supplied by the Division. The last monthly check was completed on 4/21/22. | |||
| 2022-11-02 | Violation | 908 | .1703(a)(1) |
| Health questionnaire was not completed annually. The provider did not have on file an updated health questionnaire. | |||
| 2022-11-02 | Violation | 1306 | .1703(a)(4) |
| Operator has not completed ITS-SIDS training every three years from the completion date of the previous ITS-SIDS training. The provider did not update ITS-SIDS training. The expiration date for the ITS-SIDS on file was 3/25/22. | |||
| 2022-11-02 | Violation | 1718 | .1712(e )(6) |
| The written plan of care was not given and explained to parents of children in care on or before the first day the child attended the home. Parents did not sign a statement acknowledging the receipt and explanation of the plan. Parents did not give written permission for their child to be transported by the operator for specific routine tasks that are included on the written schedule. A written plan of care was not on file for two (2) children enrolled. | |||
| 2022-11-02 | Violation | 1821 | .1724(a)(8)&(f) |
| Caregivers did not document compliance with visually checking on sleeping infants aged 12 months or younger and/or the documents were not maintained for a minimum of 30 days. The provider did not have documented times of safe sleep for a child eight (8) months of age. | |||
| 2022-11-02 | Violation | 1853 | .1719(a)(15) & .1721( e)(2) |
| The operator did not conduct a monthly fire drill. The last monthly fire drill was conducted and recorded on 5/6/22. | |||
| 2022-11-02 | Violation | 1854 | .1719(a )(16) & .1721(e )(7) |
| The operator did not conduct a quarterly lockdown or shelter-in-place drill and or the drill record was incomplete. The last documented quarterly drill was completed on 1/21/22. | |||
| 2022-11-02 | Violation | 2031 | .1726(b)&(c) |
| Operator did not provide a copy of the shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma policy to parents at time of enrollment, and / or within fourteen days of a changes to the policy. The shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma policy was not signed by one parent. | |||
| 2022-05-11 | Unannounced Inspection | No | |
| 2021-11-05 | Unannounced Inspection | Yes | |
| 2021-11-05 | Violation | 2031 | .1726(b)&(c) |
| Operator did not provide a copy of the shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma policy to parents at time of enrollment, and / or within fourteen days of a changes to the policy. The shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma policy was not signed by one parent. | |||
| 2021-11-05 | Violation | 1704 | GS 110-102 |
| Summary of the NC Child Care Law was not given to each child's parent, guardian, or full-time custodian before the child was enrolled in the home and/or signed statement was not on file. The Summary of the NC Laws statement was not signed by one parent. | |||
| 2020-12-01 | Unannounced Inspection | No | |
If you are a provider and you believe any information is incorrect, please contact us. We will research your concern and make corrections accordingly.
Write a review about Quality Academy Home Day Care. Let other families know what’s great, or what could be improved. Please read our brief review guidelines to make your review as helpful as possible.
She is great